If you take several measurements of quite literally anything (height, weight, number of words or lines in a poem), calculate the average of those measurements

and do this over and over again, you will find that the average of these averages is the same as the true average of what you are measuring if you had access to every possible observation of that thing

(all the heights, weights, number of words or lines in a poem). What I am saying is: The truth of a thing is revealed in the long run

of ongoing participation. And: the extraordinary contributes in ordinary ways, just as equally as the ordinary and the less than when subject to random selection

and the desire for randomness to add up to something.